Post by messi05 on Jan 24, 2024 7:18:22 GMT
Municipal and state health needs, under the demographic, socioeconomic, geographic and epidemiological dimensions; b) network services; and c) performance evaluation. These axes demonstrate that resources are transferred from the Union to the municipalities according to the responsibility of each entity, which, in turn, is based on their demographic, epidemiological, geographic and socioeconomic size, not being uniform values, as if it had been a federative per capita [3] , of equal value, but, yes, values in accordance with the criteria mentioned above. The apportionment criteria of Complementary Law 141, of 2012, recognize the federative differences which should guide the attribution to the federative entity [4] of providing health services, in their varied technological range, and it is an error to impose equal responsibilities on unequal entities.
Stating that each federative entity must respond, in a Buy Phone Number List supportive manner — that is, equally — to guarantee all the services that a citizen needs (from vaccination to transplant) is nonsense. People's health needs must be fully satisfied within the care network, located in the region or interregion. Among other standards, this is what can also be inferred from the diction of article 7, II, of Law 8,080, of 1990, which defines the integrality of health care, establishing that this is carried out in the system at its levels of complexity, and not by the entities, per se.
It disrespects the constitutional and legal rules of the SUS to impose joint and several responsibility on federal entities, which equally requires the guarantee of unequal services that are classified as low technological complexity and high complexity and high costs. The public health system, with universal access and decentralized and integral execution, requires conformation based on the integration of entities' services into networks of increasing complexity of services. Applying the legal concept of joint responsibility in the SUS, typical of common constitutional powers, is disregarding its constitutional and legal specificities that go beyond this concept.
Stating that each federative entity must respond, in a Buy Phone Number List supportive manner — that is, equally — to guarantee all the services that a citizen needs (from vaccination to transplant) is nonsense. People's health needs must be fully satisfied within the care network, located in the region or interregion. Among other standards, this is what can also be inferred from the diction of article 7, II, of Law 8,080, of 1990, which defines the integrality of health care, establishing that this is carried out in the system at its levels of complexity, and not by the entities, per se.
It disrespects the constitutional and legal rules of the SUS to impose joint and several responsibility on federal entities, which equally requires the guarantee of unequal services that are classified as low technological complexity and high complexity and high costs. The public health system, with universal access and decentralized and integral execution, requires conformation based on the integration of entities' services into networks of increasing complexity of services. Applying the legal concept of joint responsibility in the SUS, typical of common constitutional powers, is disregarding its constitutional and legal specificities that go beyond this concept.